Benchmarking technical efficiency of rice farms in Ghana: An empirical application of alternative production frontier approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.577Keywords:
Technical efficiency, rice production, food insecurity, new technologies, bias-corrected data envelopmentAbstract
Abstract
Aim: In spite of investments in new technologies to improve upon rice production in Ghana, productivity levels are still low. It is therefore important to assess the efficiency of farmers and identify sources of inefficiency to develop policies to reduce inefficiencies. This paper aims to investigate the extent and drivers of technical efficiency of rice farmers in Ghana.
Design/Research methods: Bias-corrected data envelopment and restricted single-stage stochastic frontier models are employed to examine the technical efficiency of farmers and its determinants. The data for empirical application come from a farm production survey comprising a total sample of 197 rice farmers from Ghana.
Conclusions and findings: The analyses revealed on average, farmers are about 65% technically efficient. This result indicates that there is a potential to improve upon technical efficiency of farmers by about 35% within the existing state of resources and technology. Furthermore, the drivers of technical efficiency were identified as food insecurity status and membership of farmer based organisation. Specifically, the results show an inverse relationship between food insecurity status and technical efficiency; where higher levels of food insecurity are associated with lower levels of technical efficiency. Also, membership of farmer based organisation increases technical efficiency of farmers. Contrary to previous studies, non-farm income and credit access were not identified as significant drivers of technical efficiency among the sampled farmers. On the basis of the findings, policies should aim at reducing food insecurity among farmers and encouraging membership of farmer based organisations.
Originality/value of the article: This paper provides evidence-based information on the extent of technical efficiency of rice farmers in Ghana and suggests measures for technical efficiency improvements.
References
Abdulai, a. & Huffman, W. E. 1998. An examination of profit inefficiency of rice farmers in Northern Ghana, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Afriat, S. N. 1972. Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 568-598
.
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. & Schmidt, P. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of econometrics, 6, 21-37.
Aigner, D. J. & Chu, S.-F. 1968. On estimating the industry production function. The American Economic Review, 826-839.
Al-Hassan, S. 2008. Technical efficiency of rice farmers in Northern Ghana. African Economic Research Consortium.
AL-Hassan, S. 2012. Technical Efficiency in Smallholder Paddy Farms in Ghana: an Analysis Based on Different Farming Systems and Gender. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3, 91-105.
Angelucci, F., Asante-Poku, A. & Anaadumba, P. 2013. Analysis of incentives and disincentives for rice in Ghana. Technical notes series, MAFAP, FAO, Rome.
Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., Latruffe, L. et al. 2008. An application of the DEA double bootstrap to examine sources of efficiency in Bangladesh rice farming. Applied Economics, 40, 1919-1925.
Battese, G. E. 1992. Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics, 7, 185-208.
Battese, G. E. & Coelli, T. J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332.
Bokusheva, RA. & Hockman, H. 2006. Production risk and technical inefficiency in Russian agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 22, 325-332.
Bravo-Ureta, B. E. & Pinheiro, A. E. 1993. efficiency analysis of developing country Agriculture: A reivew of the Frontier Function Literature.
Brümmer, B. 2001. Estimating confidence intervals for technical efficiency: the case of private farms in Slovenia. European review of agricultural economics, 28, 285-306.
Coalition for African Rice Development (CARD) (2010). “Mapping of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), Sector Strategies and Policies related to rice development in Ghana”.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2, 429-444.
Coelli, T. J. 1995. Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 39, 219-245.
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. P., O'donnell, C. J. & Battese, G. E. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, Springer Science+ Business Media.
Coffie, R. O., Burton, M. P., Gibson, F. & A. Hailu. 2016. Choice of rice production practices: A comparison between preference space and willingness to pay space Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(3), 799-819.
Donkoh, S., Ayambila, S. & Abdulai, S. 2013. Technical efficiency of rice production at the Tono Irrigation scheme in northern Ghana. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 3, 25-42.
Eling, M. & Luhnen, M. 2008. Frontier efficiency methodologies to measure performance in the insurance industry: overview and new empirical evidence. University of St. Gallen Working Papers on Risk Management and Insurance Paper, 56.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R. & Tavares, G. 2008. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-economic planning sciences, 42, 151-157.
Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120, 253-290.
Ferrier, G. D. & Hirschberg, J. G. 1997. Bootstrapping confidence intervals for linear programming efficiency scores: With an illustration using Italian banking data. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, 19-33.
Fiorentino, E., Karmann, A. & Koetter, M. 2006. The cost efficiency of German banks: a comparison of SFA and DEA. Available at SSRN 947340.
Henngingsen, A. & Henning, C.H.C.A. 2009. Imposing regional monotonicity on translog stochastic production frontiers with a simple three-step procedure. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 32,217-229.
JIRCAS. 2012. Manual for Improving Rice Production in Africa [Online]. Available: Http://Www.Jircas.Affrc.Go.Jp/English/Manual/Ricemanual2012/Ricemanual2012_Index.Html [Accessed].
Kumar, S. & Arora, N. 2010. Analyzing regional variations in capacity utilization of Indian sugar industry using non-parametric frontier technique. Eurasian Journal of Business & Economics, 2, 1-26.
Kumbhakar, S. C. 2003. Stochastic frontier analysis, Cambridge University Press.
Latruffe, L., Balcombe, K., Davidova, S. & Zawalinska, K. 2004. Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied economics, 36, 1255-1263.
Lothgren, M. 1999. Bootstrapping the Malmquist productivity index-a simulation study. Applied Economics Letters, 6, 707-710.
MOFA 2009. National Rice Development Strategy. In: MOFA (ed.). Accra, Ghana: Government Publications.
O’Donnell, C. J. & Coelli, T. J. 2005. A Bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 493-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.011.
Ofori-Bah, A. & Asafu-Adjaye, J. 2011. Scope economies and technical efficiency of cocoa agroforestry systems in Ghana. Ecological Economics, 15,1508-1518.
Ragasa, C., Dankyi, A., Acheampong, P., Wiredu, A. N., Chapoto, A., Asamoah, M. & Tripp, R. Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Technologies in Ghana, Working Paper No. 35 (International Food Policy Research Institute, Ghana,2013).
Ravn, K. 2014. Agriculture: The next frontier. Nature, 514, S64-S65.
Richmond, J. 1974. Estimating The Efficiency Of Production. International Economic Review, 515-521.
Seiford, L. M. 1994. A Dea Bibliography (1978–1992). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, And Applications. Springer.
Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W. 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management science, 44, 49-61.
Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of econometrics, 136, 31-64.
Theodoridis, A. & Psychoudakis, A. 2008. Efficiency measurement in Greek dairy farms: Stochastic frontier vs. data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 53-66.
Thiam, A., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E. & Rivas, T. E. 2001. Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta‐analysis. Agricultural Economics, 25, 235-243.
Van Den Broeck, J., Koop, G., Osiewalski, J. & Steel, M. F. 1994. Stochastic frontier models: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Econometrics, 61, 273-303.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
