Governance and decentralized energy transitions: a comparative case study of three medium-sized cities in Sweden, Canada, and the United States.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.846Keywords:
Sustainability transitions, comparative method, urban energy systems, decentralized energy, governance challenges, and energy transitions.Abstract
Aim: This study examines the impact of governance on decentralized energy transitions. Knowledge of how particular jurisdictions and their governance arrangements influence these transitions can help strengthen and contextualize divergent trajectories of decentralized energy transitions and—most importantly—reveal the role of geographical context in policy change.
Design: This research gap is addressed in this paper by comparing the uptake of decentralized energy transitions in three cities in three different countries—Luleå (Sweden), Saskatoon (Canada), and Anchorage (United States). The jurisdictions in each city has unique governance contexts pertaining to electric utilities, regulations, public policy, and public acceptance. By comparing these transitions, this study highlights the governance considerations for decentralized energy transitions and asks how does governance impact decentralized energy transitions in cities? To answer this question, actors within various public, private, and sectoral capacities were interviewed to provide their insights on decentralized energy transitions in each jurisdiction.
Conclusion: I present five governance dimensions that impact decentralized energy transitions and explain how these factors can be included to provide a more contextual understanding of patterns of decentralized energy transitions in cities.
Originality: Much of the literature on decentralized energy and cities has focused on project and sectoral level analysis and hasn’t considered the holistic nature of the energy system transition. A particular gap that would help inform a broader understanding is the jurisdictional governance impacts of decentralization energy transitions.
Implications of the Research: In practical terms, the results could be used to inform inter-jurisdictional comparisons of decentralization energy projects.
Limitations of the Research: Given that there were three case studies, it is not possible to make generalizable claims from the results.
References
Akorede, M. F., Hizam, H. and Pouresmaeil, E. (2010) ‘Distributed energy resources and benefits to the environment’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), pp. 724–734. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.025.
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (2018) Goal Program: Rating and Award Criteria Plan.
Alaska Public Utilities Commission (1998) Power Pooling/ Central dispatch Planning Study. Available at: http://rca.alaska.gov/RCAWeb/Documents/Electric/PowerPooling.pdf.
Aldiabat, K. M. and Le Navenec, C.-L. (2018) ‘Data Saturation: The Mysterious Step in Grounded Theory Methodology’, The Qualitative Report, 23(1), pp. 245–261.
Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement (2011). Available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/878004/000119312512123010/d317480dex10151.htm.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A. and Andrews, R. (2016) ‘Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: Testing the Black Box Model of Public Management Published’, Public Administration Review 70(3) 443-454, 70(3), pp. 443–454.
Annink, A. (2016) ‘Using the Research Journal Qualitative Data Collection in a Cross-Cultural Context’, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1). doi: 10.1515/erj-2015-0063.
Baker, S., Waterfield, J. and Bartlam, B. (2018) ‘Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization’, Quality and Quantity, 52(4), pp. 1893–1907.
Betsill, M. and Bulkeley, H. (2004) ‘Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance : The Cities for Climate Protection Program’, International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), pp. 471–493.
Betsill, M. and Bulkeley, H. (2007) ‘Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research’, Local Environment, 12(5), pp. 447–456. doi: 10.1080/13549830701659683.
Blanchet, T. (2015) ‘Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: How do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making?’, Energy Policy, 78, pp. 246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.001.
Block, E. S. and Erskine, L. (2012) ‘Interviewing by Telephone: Specific Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), pp. 428–445.
Van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J. and Sherman, D. K. (2018) ‘Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), pp. 492–507. doi: 10.1177/1745691617748966.
Brikland, T. A. (1998) ‘Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting’, Journal of Public Policy. University of Saskatchewan Library, 18(1), pp. 53–74. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X98000038.
Bulkeley, H. and Metsill, M. M. (2003) Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge.
Byrne, D. (2005) ‘Complexity, configurations and cases’, Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5), pp. 95–111. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057194.
Carley, S. (2009) ‘State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness’, Energy Policy, 37(8), pp. 3071–3081. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.062.
Chittum, A. and Østergaard, P. A. (2014) ‘How Danish communal heat planning empowers municipalities and benefits individual consumers’, Energy Policy, 74(C), pp. 465–474. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.001.
Chmutina, K. et al. (2014) ‘Concern or compliance? Drivers of urban decentralised energy initiatives’, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10, pp. 122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.07.001.
Christensen, C. M. (1997) The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cuase Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Christopoulos, D. (2015) ‘Exceptional or just well connected ? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making’, (December 2014), pp. 475–498. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000277.
City of Saskatoon (2017) Facilitating Solar Energy Opportunities in Saskatoon.
Compact of Mayors (2015) Compact of Mayors. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Company, A. T. (2019) Railbely utilities seek regulatory approval to form transmission utility, News Release. doi: 10.1002/pfi.4180070909.
Delmas, M., Russo, M. V. and Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2007) ‘Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), pp. 189–209. doi: 10.1002/smj.578.
Dolter, B. D. and Boucher, M. (2018) ‘Solar energy justice: A case-study analysis of Saskatchewan, Canada’, Applied Energy, 225(October 2017), pp. 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.088.
Dooley, J. J. (1998) ‘Unintended consequences: energy R&D in a deregulated energy market’, Energy Policy, 26(7), pp. 547–555.
Droege, P. (2002) ‘Renewable Energy and the City: Urban Life in an Age of Fossil Fuel Depletion and Climate Change’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22(2), pp. 87–99. doi: 10.1177/0270467602022002003.
Emelianoff, C. (2014) ‘Local Energy Transition and Multilevel Climate Governance: The Contrasted Experiences of Two Pioneer Cities (Hanover, Germany, and Vaxjo, Sweden)’, Urban Studies, 51(May 2014), pp. 1378–1393. doi: 10.1177/0042098013500087.
Emerson, R. M. (1962) ‘Power-Dependence Relations’, American Sociological Association, 27(1), pp. 31–41.
Feldman, L. and Hart, P. S. (2018) ‘Climate change as a polarizing cue: Framing effects on public support for low-carbon energy policies’, Global Environmental Change, 51(April), pp. 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.004.
Florini, A. and Sovacool, B. K. (2009) ‘Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance’, Energy Policy, 37(12), pp. 5239–5248. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.039.
Fossey, E. et al. (2002) ‘Understanding and evaluation qualitative research’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, pp. 717–732.
Gargan, J. J. (1981) ‘Consideration of Local Government Capacity’, Public Administration Review, 41(6), pp. 649–658.
Geels, F. W. (2002) ‘Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study’, Research Policy, 31(8–9), pp. 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F. W. (2014) ‘Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective’, Theory, Culture & Society, (May 2013). doi: 10.1177/0263276414531627.
Geels, F. W. et al. (2017) ‘The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitoins’, Joule, 1, pp. 463–479. doi: .1037//0033-2909.I26.1.78.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1999) Discovery of Grounded theory. New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206.
Grönkvist, S. and Sandberg, P. (2006) ‘Driving forces and obstacles with regard to co-operation between municipal energy companies and process industries in Sweden’, Energy Policy, 34(13), pp. 1508–1519. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.001.
Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods, 18(1), pp. 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
Gullers Grupp (2018) The public ’s views on climate change 2018: A quantitative survey of the Swedish public’s view on climate solutions.
Hardin, R. (1971) ‘Collective action as an agreeable n-prisoners’, Behavioral Science, 11, pp. 203–481. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830160507.
Hawkey, D., Webb, J. and Winskel, M. (2013) ‘Organisation and governance for the transformation of urban energy systems: District heating and cooling in the UK’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, pp. 22–31.
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N. and Marconi, V. C. (2017) ‘Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough ?’, Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), pp. 591–608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344.
Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2009) ‘“Urban ecological security”: A new urban paradigm?’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), pp. 193–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00832.x.
Holt, A. (2010) ‘Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note’, Qualitative Research, 10(1), pp. 113–121. doi: 10.1177/1468794109348686.
Hommels, A. (2005) ‘Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(3), pp. 323–351. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271759.
Hughes, B. R., Chaudhry, H. N. and Ghani, S. A. (2011) ‘A review of sustainable cooling technologies in buildings’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), pp. 3112–3120. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.032.
Hughes, T. P. (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
I. Goodier, C. and Chmutina, K. (2014) ‘Non-technical barriers for decentralised energy and energy efficient buildings’, International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 8(4), pp. 544–561. doi: 10.1108/IJESM-03-2014-0001.
IEA (2009) ‘Cities, Towns & Renewable Energy: Yes In My Front Yard’, p. 194. Available at: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cities2009.pdf.
IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2014, Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.
Janesick, V. J. (1999) ‘A Journal About Journal Writing as a Qualitative Research Technique: History, Issues, and Reflections’, Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), pp. 505–524.
Jiang, L. and O’Neill, B. C. (2017) ‘Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways’, Global Environmental Change. Elsevier Ltd, 42, pp. 193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008.
Kallio, H. et al. (2016) ‘Systematic methodological review : developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide’. doi: 10.1111/jan.13031.
Keirstead, J., Jennings, M. and Sivakumar, A. (2012) ‘A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), pp. 3847–3866. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.047.
Kingdon, J. (1984) Angenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
Klijn, E. H. and Teisman, G. R. (2003) ‘Institutional and strategic barriers to PPP: an analysis of dutch case’, Public Money & Management, 0962, p. 137.
Köhler, J. et al. (2019) ‘An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions’, transitionsnetwork.org, pp. 1–66.
Lancaster, K. (2017) ‘Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain politicised domain’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), pp. 93–103. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555.
Lesage, D., Van de Graaf, T. and Westphal, K. (2010) Global Energy Governance in a Multipolar World. London and New York: Ashgate Publishing.
Lin, B. and Ouyang, X. (2014) ‘Energy demand in China:comparison of characteristics between the US and China in rapid urbanization stage’, Energy Convers, 79, pp. 128–139.
Lundvall, B.-Å. et al. (2002) ‘National systems of production, innovation and competence building’, Research Policy, 31(2), pp. 213–231. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D. and Guassora, A. D. (2016) ‘Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies : Guided by Information Power’, Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), pp. 1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
Markard, J., Raven, R. and Truffer, B. (2012) ‘Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects’, Research Policy, 41(6), pp. 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
Markard, J. and Truffer, B. (2006) ‘Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change?’, Research Policy, 35(5), pp. 609–625. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008.
Mccright, A. M. et al. (2016) ‘Ideology , capitalism , and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States’, Energy Research & Social Science, 21, pp. 180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003.
Mccright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E. (2011) ‘The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American’s Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010’, The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), pp. 155–194.
Mildenberger, M. et al. (2016) ‘The distribution of climate change public opinion in Canada’, PLoS ONE, 11(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159774.
Mill, J. S. (1843) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive.
Mintrom, M. (1997) ‘Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation’, American Journal of Political Science, 41(3).
Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. (1996) ‘Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs , and Policy Change’, Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), pp. 420–435.
Miron, R. (2014) ‘The Socioeconomic Impacts of Local Energy Programmes: A Case Study of Avrig, Romania’, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25, p. 9. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-01-2014-0007.
Moe, T. M. (2005) ‘Power and Political Institutions’, Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), pp. 215–233. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPPS%2FPPS3_02%2FS1537592705050176a.pdf&code=2ffe3bf159d21d14f111c69b82140018.
Morse, J. M. (1995) ‘Editorial: The Significance of Saturation’, Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), pp. 147–149.
Moss, T., Becker, S. and Naumann, M. (2015) ‘Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions’, Local Environment, 20(12), pp. 1547–1563. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
Mulugetta, Y., Jackson, T. and van der Horst, D. (2010) ‘Carbon reduction at community scale’, Energy Policy, 38(12), pp. 7541–7545. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.050.
Muratori, M., Schuelke-Leech, B. A. and Rizzoni, G. (2014) ‘Role of residential demand response in modern electricity markets’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 33, pp. 546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.027.
Nilsson, J. S. and Mårtensson, A. (2003) ‘Municipal energy-planning and development of local energy-systems’, Applied Energy, 76(1–3), pp. 179–187. doi: 10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00062-X.
Nisbet, M. (2009) ‘Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement’, Environmental Magazine, 51(2).
Ortlipp, M. (2008) ‘Keeping and Using Reflective Journals in the Qualitative Research Process’, The Qualitative Report, 13(4), pp. 695–705.
Ostrom, E. (2000) ‘Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), pp. 137–158. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646923%5Cnhttp://about.jstor.org/terms.
Petrini, H. et al. (2004) ‘Energy Network SSAB - LuleKraft - City of Lulea: Two Decades’ Experience of Co-Productin of Steel, Electric Power and District Heating’, Scanmet II: 2nd International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, 6-8 June 2004.
Powell, W. W. (1990) ‘Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, pp. 295–336.
Ragin, C. C. (2014) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyong Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. 2nd edn. University of California Press.
Rhodes, E., Axsen, J. and Jaccard, M. (2017) ‘Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy’, Ecological Economics, 137, pp. 56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027.
Rihoux, B. et al. (2013) ‘From Niche to Mainstream Method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011’, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), pp. 175–184. doi: 10.1177/1065912912468269c.
Roberts, N. C. and King, P. J. (1991) ‘Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), pp. 147–175.
Robinson, O. C. (2014) ‘Qualitative Research in Psychology Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, pp. 25–41. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543.
Saunders, B. and Kitzinger, J. (2015) ‘Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice’, Qualitative Research, 15(5), pp. 616–632. doi: 10.1177/1468794114550439.
Schober, M. (2018) ‘The future of face-to-face interviewing’, Quality Assurance in Education, 26(2). doi: 10.1108/QAE-06-2017-0033.
Schulz, N. (2010) ‘Lessons from the London Climate Change Strategy: Focusing on Combined Heat and Power and Distributed Generation’, Journal of Urban Technology, 17(3), pp. 3–23. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2010.553038.
Shwom, R. et al. (2010) ‘Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies’, Global Environmental Change, 20(3), pp. 472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003.
Söderholm, K. (2018) ‘Pioneering industry/ municipal district heating collaboration in Sweden in the 1970s’, Energy Policy, 112, pp. 328–333.
Sperling, K. and Möller, B. (2012) ‘End-use energy savings and district heating expansion in a local renewable energy system - A short-term perspective’, Applied Energy, 92, pp. 831–842. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.040.
Stecula, D. A. and Merkley, E. (2019) ‘Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014’, Frontiers in Communication, 4(February), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006.
Swim, J. K. et al. (2011) ‘Psychology’s Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change’, American Psychologist, 66(4), pp. 241–250. doi: 10.1037/a0023220.
The Intertie Management: Committees’ Railbelt Operating and Reliability Standards (2017).
Tilley, L. and Woodthorpe, K. (2011) ‘Is it the end of anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st centruy demands on the qualitative reseacher’, Qualitative Research, 11(2), pp. 197–212. doi: 10.1177/1468794110394073.
Tilly, C. (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russel Stage Foundation.
Tura, T. and Harmaakorpi, V. (2005) ‘Social capital in building regional innovative capability’, Regional Studies, 39(8), pp. 1111–1125. doi: 10.1080/00343400500328255.
United Nations (2010) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision, Population and Development Review. New York. doi: 10.2307/2808041.
United Nations (2018) ‘68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN’, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, pp. 1–5. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
Watt, D. (2007) ‘On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity’, The Qualitative Report, 12(1), pp. 82–101.
Whetten, D. and Rogers, D. (1982) Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation. Iowa State University Press.
Wibeck, V. (2014) ‘Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: Local or distant, gradual or catastrophic?’, Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), pp. 204–219. doi: 10.1177/0963662512462787.
Wolf, J. and Moser, S. C. (2011) ‘Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(4), pp. 547–569. doi: 10.1002/wcc.120.
Wurzel, R. K. W. et al. (2019) ‘Climate pioneership and leadership in structurally disadvantaged maritime port cities’, Environmental Politics, 28(1), pp. 146–166. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1522039.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
