Austerity policies in the Eurozone: How they affect youth unemployment?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.753Keywords:
Monetary unions, fiscal consolidation, sustainable policies, youth unemployment.Abstract
Aim: Analyse the effects of stabilization policies on youth unemployment, using government deficit besides the use of fiscal policy by the supply side; aimed to characterize the economic framework conditions under which fiscal policy could reduce youth unemployment.
Design/Research methods: We consider an economic framework featuring the use of monetary and fiscal rules within a monetary union. In this scenario, that should be representative of the Eurozone, we will analyse the effects of stabilization policies when dealing with a financial crisis which produces contractive effects on output and on employment. We will pay special attention to the conservativeness of the central bank, the degree of austerity of the fiscal authorities and the initial level of government debt. Those characteristics prove to be crucial for the sustainability of economic policies packages based on fiscal consolidation and the use of fiscal policy instruments by the supply side, when trying to deal with unemployment. And given that in the financial crisis effects have been hit Eurozone countries in a different manner, we will also differentiate monetary union’s member countries according with their government debt and their unemployment path.
Conclusions/findings: Fiscal authorities should be no austere for fighting youth unemployment, when using fiscal policy by the supply side. In other words, when optimizing their loss function, they should give more weight to the output stabilization goal that to the government deficit reduction.
Originality/value of the article: Allowing for the use of both monetary and fiscal policy rules, in the scenario of a monetary union, our results could help us to stablish the conditions under which fiscal policy could help to alleviate youth unemployment.
References
Ahlborn M., Wortmann M. (2017), Output gap similarities in Europe. Detecting country groups, Center for European Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers, no. 305, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Germany.
Barrios S., Langedijk S., Pench L. (2010), EU fiscal consolidation after the financial crisis. Lessons from past experiences, Economic Paper 418, Dirección General de Asuntos Económicos y Financieros, Comisión Europea.
Bertola G. (2017), European unemployment revisited. Shocks, institutions, integration, „Research in Economics”, vol. 71 no. 3, pp. 588-612.
Blanchard O.J. (2004), Explaining European unemployment, NBER Reporter, Summer.
Bajo-Rubio O., Díaz-Roldán C. (2009), Does the balance of payments constrain economic growth? Some evidence for the new EU members, „Post-Communist Economies”, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 41-46.
Díaz-Roldán C. (2017), Fiscal performance in monetary unions. How much austerity should be allowed?, „Panoeconomicus”, vol. 64 no. 1, pp. 61-76, http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1452-595X/2017/1452-595X1600021D.pdf
Díaz-Roldán C. (2018), On the effectiveness of fiscal policies by the supply side in monetary unions, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, mimeo.
European Central Bank (2013), The importance and effectiveness of national fiscal frameworks in the EU, „Monthly Bulletin”, no. 2 (February), pp. 73-88.
European Commission (2008), Recommendation of the European Commission 2008/867/EC, of October 3.
European Commission (2017), Press release, May 30.
Gómez S., Gómez E., Bardí C., Barón J. (2016), El camino hacia el empleo juvenil, Observatorio empresarial contra la pobreza, Fundación Tomillo y Fundación CODESPA.
Picatoste J., Ruesga-Benito S., González-Laxe F. (2016), Economic sustainability and possibilities of action for the states, in the case of monetary integration. Some notes for reflection, „Progress in Industrial Ecology. An International Journal”, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 16-33.
Rozmahel P., Grochová L.I., Liztman M. (2014), Evaluation of competitiveness in the European Union. Alternative perspectives, „Procedia Economics and Finance”, vol. 12, pp. 575-581.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
